Michael J. Shivick, Esq.
  • CALL US TODAY: (774) - 262 - 7281
Michael J. Shivick, Esq.
  • Shivicklaw
  • Attorney Shivick
  • Massachusetts Consumer Law Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Shivicklaw Forms & Links

Narcissistic or Aloof Massachusetts Landlord May Trigger Quiet Enjoyment and Anti-Retaliation Statutes

Home| Uncategorized| Narcissistic or Aloof Massachusetts Landlord May Trigger Quiet Enjoyment and Anti-Retaliation Statutes

01
Jan, 2018
By Michael J. Shivick, Esq.
  • Uncategorized
  • No comments

There is a constant whine in Massachusetts akin to the Taos hum.  It appears on further inspection to be Massachusetts landlords continually griping about the alleged unfairness of Massachusetts landlord-tenant law – despite winning the supermajority of judgments in eviction cases. It is true that landlords may end up on the hook for substantial judgments in rare cases, but the reality is that those judgments simply represent compensation due the tenant for what the landlord was up to in those circumstances.

The real reason landlords are banged out in such brutal fashion is either 1) they are narcissistic and are going to do whatever they want or 2) they never bothered to understand the law and want to decry the laws as “unfair” when it was their own ignorance that cost them…plain and simple. Ignorance of the law is no affirmative defense in housing court.

In Ianello v CMC, 400 Mass. 321 (1987) the Supreme Judicial Court held that a landlord violated both the Quiet Enjoyment and Anti-Retaliation statutes when it locked a tenant out of a conference/exercise room indefinitely, in response to tenant’s resisting a rent-increase with other tenants at the property. The protected behavior was both the tenant’s resistance and engaging in tenant union activity with other tenants by discussing resisting the rent increase. Ianello v CMC, 400 Mass. 321, 323-325 (1987). The Court there awarded the triple rent clause under the Quiet Enjoyment law and also one month under the Anti-Retaliation law, holding this was not duplicative recovery.

The landlord in that case may hypothetically be upset the law protected the tenant’s right to not pay a rent increase until certain conditions were met. S/he may prattle on about how unfair this “state” is and how they’ve “been in the business 25 years and never had to deal with this,” or other irrelevant whining. The simple facts of that case show a landlord who decided it was a one way street, trampling over the Legislature and Courts in the childish tantrum, and unilaterally effectuated a partial actual eviction of the tenant from that exercise/conference room by locking the door indefinitely – when the legal remedy was eviction for non-payment of rent after determination of the tenancy – which may in itself be insufficient to rebut the Anti-Retaliation law, M.G.L. c.186 s.18 and M.G.L. c.239 s.2A.

About Admin

Attorney Shivick is a Massachusetts attorney and solo-practitioner accepting cases throughout the Commonwealth.

Leave A Reply Form Cancel reply

Site Menu

  • Shivicklaw
  • Attorney Shivick
  • Massachusetts Consumer Law Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Shivicklaw Forms & Links
Powered by Cinch IT

Latest Posts

January 4, 2021 | Michael J. Shivick, Esq. Massachusetts Home...

Don't let your dream home become the nightmare on your street. Attorney Shivick reviews M.G.L. c.142A and provides you with 5 red flags to help you identify and protect yourself from predatory residential contractors in Massachusetts.

November 29, 2020 | Michael J. Shivick, Esq. Home Buyer With...

Is building your dream home becoming a nightmare? Late contractors.

August 12, 2020 | Michael J. Shivick, Esq. Appealing Section...

Massachusetts tenants have complained to me about the callousedness they

December 15, 2019 | Michael J. Shivick, Esq. Top 5 Mistakes...

1. What Did You Sign? The most common mistake most tenants

Contact Info

  • PO BOX 428

    Rochdale, MA

    01542

    Appointment

    Only

  • 774-262-7281

  • info@shivicklaw.com

Follow Us on Facebook

Youtube

SHIVICK LAW

Consumer Vlog

Watch Now
SHIVICKLAW.COM. Michael J. Shivick, Esq. © All Rights Reserved. The material on this website is for information purposes only and is not a substitute for actual legal advice from an attorney for your individual case or situation. The information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. This office can not consider you a client until Attorney Shivick has met with you personally about your legal matter and agrees to take your case. Please do not send any written materials to this office until we have actually consulted with you. Prior results can not guarantee similar outcomes with respect to any future matter in which a lawyer may be retained. Any reference to a Free Consultation is limited exclusively to a 15-minute phone consultation.